DEVELOPING A CAREER PORTFOLIO:
THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY
APPROACH
by
Robert Reardon, Ph.D.[1]
October 14, 1997
Introduction
In responding to a suggestion by
President D’Alemberte following the Seminole Futures luncheon on September 12,
1997, faculty and staff in the Tech Center[2]
set about to examine programmatic ways to teach and/or certify the development
of workforce skills in FSU graduates.
In doing this work, the Tech Center drew upon prior career development
research and service undertaken at FSU (Peterson, Sampson, & Reardon, 1991;
Peterson, Sampson, Reardon, & Lenz, 1996).
This work is based on a Cognitive Information Processing (CIP) theory of
career problem solving and decision making, and we think it is an especially
useful model to guide the current project.
In the following paragraphs, we will use the CASVE Cycle, a generic
problem solving model taken from CIP theory, to explore the use of career
portfolios in the development of workforce skills in FSU graduates.
At the outset it is important to
define two terms, career and work (Sears, 1982). Career
is defined as the “working out of a purposeful life pattern through work
undertaken by a person.” A career is
unique to a person; it is a process of balancing life roles, e.g., student, parent,
spouse/partner, citizen, worker, which occur through one’s lifetime. Work
is defined as “activity that produces something of value for one’s self or
others.” This includes unpaid,
volunteer work, as well as paid employment.
A Concept Proposal
Communication
In CIP theory, career interventions
focus on the “gaps” between a current and ideal state of affairs. These gaps are communicated to students, policy makers, and educational leaders in
many different ways, both formal and informal.
In the present situation:
1. Many college students would value having a strategic career
plan at the time of graduation which would strengthen their career pursuits.
2.
FSU would benefit
from producing the kinds of workers needed in the global workforce
characterized by lean production and new ways of working.
3.
Employers of FSU
graduates would value assurance that FSU students are ready to make effective
contributions in the contemporary workplace.
4.
The State of Florida
would benefit from more cost-effective use of public funds.
A desirable university-based career
intervention would address these conditions as experienced by students, the
university, employers, and public officials.
Reduction in these gaps would increase the economic productivity and
career satisfaction of Florida citizens.
Analysis
In CIP theory, analysis involves a review of all the causal factors that
contribute to gaps. It is beyond the
scope of this brief paper to review all of the relevant factors, but several
aspects can be suggested.
·
Generic workforce
skills and learning outcomes needed by college graduates have been identified
by government agencies, professional associations, and private consortia. This prior work can be adapted for this
project.
·
FSU has been engaged
since 1970 in developing innovative career services and programs that directly
connect to the teaching/learning mission of the university. For example, a variable credit course, SDS
3340 Introduction to Career Development, provides instruction directly related
to the workforce skills noted earlier.
·
The successful
institutionalization of career interventions in universities is related to
curriculum infusion and the development of learner centered activities. Career programs should ideally draw upon
strengths from both academic affairs and student affairs. Course-based interventions provide a
mechanism to recover costs for services, academic credibility for the quality
of the intervention, and recognition of learning on the academic transcript.
·
Career services is a
boundary spanning function that links education and employment; it provides for
connections between education and work organizations. In social systems terms, employers provide a feedback mechanism
to the university regarding the effectiveness of its educational program. Employers have important contributions to
make in the identification of the learner outcomes regarding career.
·
A “career portfolio”
is one possible focal point of a program to enhance workforce skills of FSU
graduates. Portfolio development could
be incorporated into the SDS 3340 course.
This portfolio program could also be initiated by lower division
students or final term seniors, and it might provide documentation to employers
regarding specific learning activities undertaken by the student to
operationalize a strategic career plan.
In CIP theory, synthesis involves reviewing all possible options for program
design and operation. For example, one
might envision a grid with one side listing workforce skills and the other side
listing alternative methods for developing such competencies. The identification of all variables in such
a grid is beyond the scope of this paper.
However, several aspects of a possible career portfolio program are
noted below.
·
Program initiated and
managed by FSU students in consultation with career services professionals.
·
Program available in
both a course format and noncredit learning activities.
·
Program has a strong
academic content base, e.g., Career Development and Planning: A Cognitive
Approach (textbook presently underdevelopment at FSU).
·
Course instruction
eventually available in alternative formats, e.g., self-paced modules, distance
learning, weekend workshops.
·
Courseware available
in varied sites, e.g., FSU Career Center, public library, Internet.
·
Program competencies
certified by a panel of FSU employers, e.g., Placement Partners, Florida
Chamber of Commerce.
·
Program would
encompass most learning activities presently available through the FSU Career
Center (full development of this program idea would require additional funding
for the Career Center).
Valuing
In CIP theory, valuing involves examining all the possible program alternatives
identified in synthesis and
prioritizing alternative program options that will remove the gaps identified in
the communication stage of the CASVE
Cycle. In this preliminary paper, we
can illustrate this process by selecting the career portfolio option as a
programmatic solution to the four gaps identified earlier.
A career portfolio might include
lists of workforce skills identified by employers that FSU students could use
to think more strategically about their career planning. The career portfolio could also list
alternative credit and noncredit activities that would enable students to certify
their capability to demonstrate various workforce skills and competencies.
The content basis of the career
portfolio would include knowledge in course materials included in SDS 3340, as
well as other learning activities already available to FSU students
irregardless of their major. Engaging
in specified career portfolio activities would enable FSU to conceptualize and
promote how these learning events enhance the workforce development of FSU
students.
The career portfolio would also
enable employers of FSU graduates to participate in selecting generic workforce
development skills desired in new hires.
Taken together, the career portfolio might assist students in thinking
more strategically about their careers and to align their career goals more
closely with the workforce trends in Florida and the nation.
Execution
In CIP theory, execution would involve a tryout of a career portfolio program or
some other program option on some limited basis. Pending a formal request from administrative leaders or groups
(an RFP), execution would require the
development of a full program proposal specifying all the personnel, materials,
facilities, and organizational arrangements needed to launch a program. Given present staff commitments and constraints,
it is anticipated that the development of such a proposal would take 10-12
months.
Many of the learning resources and
intellectual capital needed to launch a career portfolio program are already
available at FSU. In this sense, the
career portfolio program could be infused into already existing organizational
structures and programs; it would not need to be “added on” to what is already
present. The Tech Center could provide
leadership in this endeavor.
However, new staff resources would
be required to offer this program on an extended basis and 10 months are needed
to complete the SDS 3340 courseware materials presently under development. Other resource needs would await the
development of a formal program proposal.
Summary
This paper has briefly outlined an
approach to helping FSU students develop a strategic career vision that
reflects the realities of present and future workforce needs in Florida. A very preliminary review suggests that a
career portfolio program might provide a way for students to develop workforce
skills that will provide a foundation for career success. The Cognitive Information Processing theory
developed by FSU faculty and staff was used to guide the development of this
program idea.
References
Peterson, G.,
Sampson, J., & Reardon, R. (1991). Career
development and services: A cognitive
approach. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Peterson, G.,
Sampson, J., & Reardon, R., & Lenz, J. (1996). A cognitive information processing
approach. In D. Brown & L. Brooks
(Eds.), Career choice and development (3rd ed., pp. 423-475). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Sears, S.
(1982). A definition of career guidance
terms: A National Vocational Guidance
Association perspective. Vocational
Guidance Quarterly, 31, 137-143.
c:\3340\xprojct\draft1.doc
[1] Contributing authors:
Dr. Jeff Garis, Dr. Janet Lenz, Dr. Gary Peterson, Dr. Jim Sampson.
[2] Center for the Study of Technology in Counseling and Career
Development, a unit of the Career Center (Division of Student Affairs) and the
Department of Human Services and Studies (College of Education), at The Florida
State University.